Advertisement
Women's health information
covering breast cancer, infertility,
female sexuality, aging, diet and
women's health policy.
BACK TO...

Aphrodite's Home Page

ARTICLES ABOUT...

Female Sexuality

Relationships

Sexual Dysfunction

Looking Good

STDs

Men

Contraception

Reproductive Health

Conceiving

Pregnancy

Incontinence

Mental Health

Children's Health

Eating Well

Healthy Living

Supplements

Menopause

Weight Issues

Breast Cancer

Custom Search

Advertisement



HELP WITH...

Relationship Questions

Your Dreams

Personal Development

Counseling By Email

DISCUSSION FORUMS...

Female Sexuality

Trying To Conceive

Reproductive Health

General Health

Contraception

Menopause

Pregnancy

Parenting

Relationships

Members' Pics

Everything But Health

Latest Forum Posts
baby shower ideas?!?!
by HarleyQuinn
New Member with a Hang Up
by festus
****Daily Drama of 13 Mamas - Part 2****
by Bryony
piercings
by Jessica83
MUMS OF BABIES 3-6 MTHS
by **Cleo**
Funny saying's!
by HarleyQuinn
Why say this to someone??
by HarleyQuinn

3 April 2002
Up To 27% Of Tumours Not Detected From Mammograms

Results from an exercise in rereading mammographies from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme has shown that 27% of tumours found between screenings could have been detected from the mammograms, according to research reported at the 3rd European Breast Cancer Conference in Barcelona today (Friday 22 March).

However the researcher leading the study, Mrs Hege Wang MSc., is cautious about describing such tumours as "missed" cancers.

Six radiologists looked at a total of 723 mammograms, of which 350 either had cancers that had been detected during screening (118) or had cancers detected in the period between screenings (interval cancers).

Although it was a "blinded" review (they did not know in advance whether the mammogram showed a tumour or not), the radiologists did know that about 50% of the cases were either cancers or subsequent interval cancers, and therefore that they would have to select a high number of cases.

Mrs Wang, a researcher with the Norwegian Cancer Registry, said: "The experimental set-up is very different from the daily work of screening radiologists. In the normal daily routine, only three to five per cent of mammograms are recalled for suspected cancer, and it is very important not to have too high a recall rate in screening in order to avoid false positive results. So the fact that retrospectively the radiologists detected 27% of previously undetected cancers does not necessarily mean that they were missed. The figure of 27% corresponds to about 5% of the total number of breast cancers detected amongst these women during this period."

Results from the study showed that 50% of lesions were not selected by any of the radiologists, 23% were selected by one or two, and 27% by three or more.

Mrs Wang said: "Reviewing interval cancers is complicated but sensible and important. The data must be interpreted with care. There is no simple way of classifying an interval cancer as missed, however, based on these results, it is reasonable to conclude that 27% of the lesions could have been detected during screening."


Talk About This Article In The Forum...

Advertisement

Home Page | Discussion Forums | About Us | Privacy
Your use of this website indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
© 2002 - 2008 Aphrodite Women's Health and its licensors. All rights reserved.